但是，梳理中美之間的摩擦，可以看出，中國還是一個被動接受者，而不是一個積極出擊者。這塑造了美國在議程中的主導權，不得不讓中國被動應對。這既是中國自身實力的限制，也是戰略的設定。中美之間的這種不平衡的衝突局面仍將繼續。未來的中美摩擦，少一些“誰更需要誰[6]”的冷戰對抗思維，多一些對雙方合作的認知不無裨益。
體驗網易郵箱2G超大附件，輕鬆發優質大電影、大照片，提速3倍!
[1]在十一屆全國人大三次會議記者會上溫家寶總理答中外記者問，人民網，http://www.people.com.cn/GB/181468/183345/11141157.html，2010-3-15
[2] C. Fred Bergsten, Bates Gill, Nicholas R. Lardy, and Derek Mitchell, China: The Balance Sheet: What the World Needs to Know Now about the Emerging Superpower (New York: Public Affairs, 2006).
[3]可參見Charles A.Kupchan的Power in Transition: The Peaceful Change of International Order，United Nations University Press，2001.
[4] Robert D. Kaplan, “How we would fight China”, The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/06/how-we-would-fight-china/3959/
[5] Joshua Cooper Ramo, “Hu's Visit: Finding a Way Forward on U.S.-China Relations”, TIME, Thursday, Apr. 08.
[6]參見Philip Bowring, “Who needs whom more? ” The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/opinion/04iht-edbowring.html,2010-2-4
******本文來源求是理論網，原文網址：http://www.qstheory.cn/lg/zl/201104/t20110426_78433.htm |
